Evaluation Sheets/drafts

Does anyone have any evaluation papers they have made up? I want to do one for each of my dogs, but if someone already had a layout they didn't mind sharing, that would be AWESOME

Storm sent me this sample:

PUPPY EVALUATION FORMAT

TESTICLES: YES OR NO?

HEAD:
...
NECK:

SHOULDERS:

UPPER ARM:

ELBOWS:

FRONT (FORE-CHEST):

FRONT ASSEMBLY ANGLES:

DEPTH OF CHEST:

UNDERLINE:

LENGTH OF RIBCAGE AND LOIN:

HOCK ANGLE AND HEIGHT:

REAR ASSEMBLY AND PROPORTIONS:

FIT OF KNEES:

PLACEMENT OF THE FEET:

TIGHTNESS OF THE FEET:

SHAPE OF THE PELVIS:

BALANCE OF MUSCLE MASS
ON THE LEGS AND THIGHS:

HOCK STABILITY:

TOPLINE
STANDING AND IN MOTION:

CROUP:

TAILSET AND CARRAIGE:

BITE (SCISSORS):
BITE (OCCLUSION):

COLORS AND MARKINGS:

EYES (COLOR AND SHAPE):

GRADE ON A SCALE OF 1-5 WITH 5 AS THE HIGH
AND 1 AS THE LOW MARK. MARK AS SP (SHOW
POTENTIAL OR CH (FOR COMPANION HOME
AS A PET).

here are a few sites that had some:

http://www.akitanetwork.com/breeder/PuppyEvaluationForm.pdf

http://www.corgis.biz/CWC%20Evaluation%20Form.htm

http://www.corgis.biz/litter_evaluation_score_sheet.htm

I'm thining if we can't come up with a premade dachshund form, we can always make one up for everyone to use Hmmm project # 99990011

I like the one from the Akita's site. That's a nice, efficient format.

As an add-on to this, Pat Taylor's Puppy Puzzle says that for a show potential, none of the puppy's traits should be less than a "3". Everything on that puppy should be average or above. Anything else should go to a companion home. I personally think that's a bit harsh, but I wouldn't keep a pup with more than one trait under a "3", I don't think. And average means an average example of that breed that you would see in the show ring, so that's a high standard.